Long-acting injectables (LAIs) are thought to have a number of advantages over oral antipsychotics (APs), including removing the need for daily administration, improving adherence, and enhancing patient outcomes.1 However, LAIs remain underutilized relative to oral APs, with one analysis of commercially insured patients finding that oral APs represent 68.1% of prescriptions, compared with 4.6% for LAIs.2
At the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting in 2022, Dr. Christoph Correll (Professor of Psychiatry at the Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, and Professor and Chair of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité University Medicine, Berlin) discussed the factors that influence physicians’ views on LAIs, and explored data from research on patient attitudes to LAIs.
Before patients are initiated on LAI therapy, over half receive at least two different oral APs.3 However, when LAI therapy is initiated, 86% remain on that LAI successfully, with only 13% moving to a second LAI.3
Listen to Dr. Corell discuss how LAIs have been underutilized in the US:
In a survey of physicians, the top factors that prevented them from prescribing LAIs were cost, lack of regular availability, concern over serious adverse events, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome or extrapyramidal symptoms, and patients being scared of using an injectable medication.4 Over half believed they underuse LAIs to a certain extent, and nearly 20% thought they definitely, or to a large extent, underuse LAIs.4
Listen to Dr. Correll describe physicians’ beliefs around their underuse of LAIs:
Physicians may believe that patients do not wish to be treated with an LAI. Reasons commonly proposed include perceived stigma, embarrassment, reduced autonomy, a feeling of being controlled, loss of ability to control when medication is taken, observation time at the clinic, a feeling of being bound to the clinic, and injection-site pain.5 In a study comparing the responses of 63 health professionals and 101 patients on oral APs, who were asked to grade the effect of each of these factors on a scale from 0 (does not affect at all) to 100 (decisive in declining LAIs), the actual fears of patients were lower for each factor, except for being tied to a clinic and loss of ability to decide when to take medication.5
Furthermore, among patients with experience of being treated with an LAI, the actual fear fell numerically for each factor, and significantly so with respect to being tied to a clinic (P=0.018) and loss of ability to decide when to take medication (P=0.001) compared with patients on oral APs.5
Listen to Dr. Correll discuss a study demonstrating actual patient attitudes to LAIs:
Training clinical staff may increase utilization of LAIs. In one clinical study in particlular, staff were educated on the benefits of LAIs and trained in strategies to improve communication and overcome logistical barriers. After this, 91% of patients accepted at least one LAI during their first 3 months in the study.6
In summary, it is a myth that patients do not want or will not accept treatment with LAIs, and you can understand why this myth persists by viewing the full presentations at APA 2022 here To download Dr. Correll’s presentation slides, visit: https://uscnsb.tevapharm.com/scope-engage/
Dr. Correll’s full APA presentation: NPS-US-NP-01073
NPS-US-NP-01128