The 6th Psych Congress Elevate took place in Las Vegas, Nevada, from June 3–5 2022, providing a forum for mental health clinicians to meet, network, and advance both their careers and the field of mental health. This year’s congress delivered a transformative educational experience in which attendees were provided the opportunity to engage in three days of cutting-edge research that translated into clinical application. This article highlights the key scientific sessions of interest.
Citrome L, Matthews D, and Yeiser B – Addressing persistent myths and misconceptions in tardive dyskinesia1 | Teva- and Neurocrine-sponsored educational symposium
Bahroo L and Hughes J – Tardive dyskinesia: overcoming the challenges of differential diagnosis & treatment in the era of telepsychiatry1 | Neurocrine-sponsored product theater
Mattingly G and Pridgen B – Breaking down the barriers to utilizing long-acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia management1 | Teva- and Alkermes-sponsored educational symposium
Alva G and Baldwin L – Empowered decision making: a treatment team approach to long-acting injectables for adult clients with schizophrenia1 | Janssen-sponsored product theater
This session focused on:
Tardive dyskinesia across the complexity spectrum: from quality-of-life improvement to novel treatments1 | Teva and Neurocrine de novo poster
Geffner-Smith A, Meyer J, Stewart M, Williams P
Objective: This analysis aimed to assess the learners’ knowledge upon completion of the TD 360 curriculum of educational activities. The purpose of the TD 360 curriculum was to increase the awareness of TD impact on patient outcomes, barriers to care, clinical guideline treatment recommendations, and VMAT2 inhibitors.
Results: Findings demonstrated a 63% increase in learners’ knowledge following participation in any of the educational programs within the curriculum in 2020 and 2021.
Development of the MIND-TD questionnaire as a screening tool for tardive dyskinesia1 | Neurocrine encore poster
Lundt L, Jain R, Basin P, Matthews D, Shah C, Roque A, Vanderhoef D, Kelly C
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of MIND-TD, a questionnaire based on input from a panel of expert clinicians to help healthcare professionals screen for TD, to identify patients requiring further assessments for TD. Part 1 of the questionnaire included a yes/no question for each of the following topics: Movement, Impact, Notice, and Daily Activities. Part 2 of the questionnaire included items related to physical/functional difficulties (Thorough Interview) and checklists of characteristic movements for TD and other drug-induced movement disorders (Differentiate).
Results: Authors concluded that MIND-TD can be used at routine in-person, virtual, or audio-only visits to identify patients who may require further assessments for TD.
Early versus late administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents among patients with newly-diagnosed schizophrenia: an analysis of a commercial claims database1 | Teva de novo poster
Kane J, Chen A, Lim S, Mychaskiw M, Tian M, Wang Y, Suett M, Rubio J
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with newly-diagnosed SZ treated with atypical LAIs within 1 year (early) versus >1 year (late) after diagnosis.
Results: Overall, SZ-related HCRU and cost were lower for patients who initiated LAIs early versus with those who initiated LAIs late; with a mean difference of $2301.03 between both groups. Hospitalizations were comparable between groups, while costs were lower for the early LAI group. A greater proportion of patients with SZ who initiated a LAI within one year of diagnosis achieved successful LAI implementation (53.9%) versus those who initiated a LAI >1 year after diagnosis (48.0%).
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics: practical considerations and impact on adherence in schizophrenia1 | Janssen poster
Citrome L, Geffner-Smith A, Stewart M, Williams P
Objective: This analysis assessed an educational curriculum that was designed to meet learning objectives associated with SZ identification and treatment using LAIs. Educational objectives included discerning differences among LAIs, understanding adherence challenges, and implementing patient-centric communication strategies to improve patient acceptance of LAIs.
Results: Findings demonstrated a 94% increase in learners’ knowledge following participation in any of the educational programs within the curriculum in 2020 and 2021. Prior to engaging in the activities, clinicians displayed low levels of knowledge regarding the pharmacology of current medications and implementation strategies to facilitate patient acceptance of LAIs. Following completion of the activities, clinicians were likely to indicate increased knowledge, and felt more confident in their ability to properly use LAIs in the clinic, potentially indicating educational success.
NPS-US-NP-01147